Denise Duhamel
How It Will End
Have you ever gotten consumed by watching a couple argue in public and trying to decipher what’s really going on between them? Denise Duhamel’s deliciously entertaining “How It Will End” offers us that experience. Come for the voyeurism, stay for the awareness it stirs up. Why are we so captivated by other people’s disagreements? And how can what we notice about them teach us about ourselves?
We’re pleased to offer Denise Duhamel’s poem and invite you to subscribe to Pádraig’s weekly Poetry Unbound Substack newsletter, read the Poetry Unbound book, or listen to past episodes of the podcast. Order your copy of Kitchen Hymns (new poems from Pádraig) and 44 Poems on Being with Each Other (new essays by Pádraig) wherever you buy books.
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5954b/5954b1442c5a3ebcbab28600694cfe6b371995ee" alt="Image of Denise Duhamel"
Denise Duhamel is a distinguished university professor in the MFA program at Florida International University in Miami. She is the author of several poetry collections, including Pink Lady, Scald, and Blowout. She is a recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts.
Transcript
Transcription by Alletta Cooper
Pádraig Ó Tuama: My name is Pádraig Ó Tuama and some of the best stories I’ve ever heard are ones where it’s not entirely clear how it ends, where you’re left on the edge going, What’s going to happen? That’s the way that the story then continues. It gets into you and you find yourself going back and looking for clues and looking for ideas and arguing with your friends about what happened and what it meant. I think that’s one of the ways that stories really work on us, and I love it when a poem can do that.
[music: “Praise the Rain” by Gautam Srikishan]
“How It Will End” by Denise Duhamel
“We’re walking on the boardwalk
but stop when we see a lifeguard and his girlfriend
fighting. We can’t hear what they’re saying,
but it is as good as a movie. We sit on a bench to find out
how it will end. I can tell by her body language
he’s done something really bad. She stands at the bottom
of the ramp that leads to his hut. He tries to walk halfway down
to meet her, but she keeps signaling don’t come closer.
My husband says, ‘Boy, he’s sure in for it,’
and I say, ‘He deserves whatever’s coming to him.’
My husband thinks the lifeguard’s cheated, but I think
she’s sick of him only working part time
or maybe he forgot to put the rent in the mail.
The lifeguard tries to reach out
and she holds her hand like Diana Ross
when she performed ‘Stop in the Name of Love.’
The red flag that slaps against his station means strong currents.
‘She has to just get it out of her system,’
my husband laughs, but I’m not laughing.
I start to coach the girl to leave her no-good lifeguard,
but my husband predicts she’ll never leave.
I’m angry at him for seeing glee in their situation
and say, ‘That’s your problem–you think every fight
is funny. You never take her seriously,’ and he says,
‘You never even give the guy a chance and you’re always nagging,
so how can he tell the real issues from the nitpicking?’
and I say, ‘She doesn’t nitpick!’ and he says, ‘Oh really?
Maybe he should start recording her tirades,’ and I say,
‘Maybe he should help out more,’ and he says,
‘Maybe she should be more supportive,’ and I say,
‘Do you mean supportive or do you mean support him?’
and my husband says that he’s doing the best he can,
that he’s a lifeguard for Christ’s sake, and I say
that her job is much harder, that she’s a waitress
who works nights carrying heavy trays and is hit on all the time
by creepy tourists and he just sits there most days napping
and listening to ‘Power 96’ and then ooh
he gets to be the big hero blowing his whistle
and running into the water to save beach bunnies who flatter him,
and my husband says, it’s not as though she’s Miss Innocence
and what about the way she flirts, giving free refills
when her boss isn’t looking or cutting extra large pieces of pie
to get bigger tips, oh no she wouldn’t do that because she’s a saint
and he’s the devil, and I say, ‘I don’t know why you can’t just admit
he’s a jerk,’ and my husband says, ‘I don’t know why you can’t admit
she’s a killjoy,’ and then out of the blue the couple is making up.
The red flag flutters, then hangs limp.
She has her arms around his neck and is crying into his shoulder.
He whisks her up into his hut. We look around, but no one is watching us.”
[music: “Dirtbike Lovers” by Blue Dot Sessions]
I love this poem by Denise Duhamel. The first time I read it, I laughed out loud. It is so entertaining and does so many things at the same time. There’s a stage and a stage. The first stage is the boardwalk and the characters come in twos: the lifeguard and his girlfriend, and then the speaker and her husband. The poem is absolutely clear that the observing couple can’t hear what’s going on, but the body language — to them anyway — seems so striking that they’re able to fill in the gaps. Although, obviously, one of the layers of this poem is how different the gaps are filled in by this couple who are married to each other. They each take different sides and they each observe what’s going on. I love the throwaway line about “The lifeguard tries to reach out / and she holds her hand like Diana Ross / when she performed ‘Stop in the Name of Love.’” And so suddenly this stage isn’t just the stage about what’s happening, it’s also the stage about what else is being referenced: pop stars and drama, and obviously then enormous projection from their own life into the silent drama as it’s occurring in front of them.
Silent movies are a thing of the past, perhaps. But there are silent movies happening all around us — when you see people talking, when you’re passing them by, if you’re driving or in a bus or sitting waiting and seeing something happen where you can’t discern what’s being said but the silent movie of life as it unfolds in front of us, allows for so much projection and so much of that is perhaps my own unconscious finding some archetypes for me to splatter with my own thoughts.
[music: “Cornicob” by Blue Dot Sessions]
The limited way of imagining how we see couples, especially what we think are straight couples, act out, become so clear. You know, he’s referred to the lifeguard as the “no-good lifeguard,” and then the husband projects onto the girlfriend that she’s always nagging and nitpicking and goes on tirades. And then the wife begins to project onto the lifeguard that he should help out more and that there should be more support going on. And then it just continues to escalate.
The projection is that it is the girlfriend who was working as a waitress, and she’s hit on all the time and how difficult that must be. But then her husband comes back and says, no, no, no, she’s the one who’s flirting, giving free refills and extra large pieces of pie. And in fact, she says the lifeguard, is the one who’s flirting, “running into the water to save beach bunnies who flatter him.” These are so reductive [laughs], and they’re entirely entertaining. And I want to look at my entertainment because I think partly the way the whole poem ends — “We look around, but no one is watching us.” — that’s a setup too. We are watching them. I’m watching them every time I read it. We’re all watching them now listening to this. And the question is, is who are we reducing when we look at this poem? And how is it that I too am being brought into the soap opera drama of this? It’s like Days of Our Lives happening in poetic form and it has a sharp point, which is who are you watching and what are you making them do by your watching?
[music: “Selena Leica” by Blue Dot Sessions]
One of the things about conflict is that it can escalate. I think we all know that. Something can start off small and then suddenly something happens and it just gets bigger and bigger and bigger. And at the beginning of this poem, there’s back and forth, “‘Boy, he’s sure in for it,’” and “‘He deserves whatever’s coming to him.’” They’re just looking and, correctly or incorrectly, guessing at what’s going on. And their only disagreement at that stage is, what has the lifeguard done? What’s his sin? Has he cheated or has he not paid the rent?
But then when the speaker states, “You never take her seriously” there is a 255-word long sentence, and this escalates and rises, and they demand and accuse and project and one identifies here and assumes something about the other. And they build and build and build in this fight. And they seem to assume that they know absolutely everything about what’s going on. And this long sentence becomes a little bit breathless and energy builds. And the energy within it is multiple. It’s energy of aggression, but it’s also erotic energy. The argumentative energy. I wonder, is it meant to echo sex? And if it is, is it bad sex? Is it angry sex? Is it good sex?
Somehow they’ve been getting pleasure from their projections onto this couple of the lifeguard and the girlfriend and the pleasure is in rehearsing old arguments and falling apart. But I want to wonder in the erotic energy of this long sentence, are either of them actually satisfied? Or are they getting satisfaction from saying they’re not satisfied? I wonder, is part of the art of this brilliant poem implying that fighting can sometimes replace sex for couples? And where is this going? What’s going to happen? Will it challenge or will it just fade away and they’ll begin to repeat it again with whatever other circumstance, something on television or something on the bus or something in the family where they can project their hostility towards each other?
Suddenly then, shockingly, “out of the blue the couple is making up.” The entire energy of the poem deflates. “The red flag flutters, then hangs limp.” And if we hadn’t been thinking of phallic projection, well then Denise Duhamel has just presented to us on a plate to say, you absolutely need to take this as some kind of indication of eros and sex and understanding of the erotic life of people as caught up in the way that we act as people outside the sex act. And that we need to ask seriously, What is it that satisfies us? And is the thing that gives us pleasure based on a reduction of other people and a reduction of ourselves too in the acting of that?
[music: “Outstretched Hands” by Gautam Srikishan]
One of the things I adore about this poem is the close attention that Denise Duhamel pays to the way that people tell stories about the couples you observe. Well, then he said, and then she said, and then I said, and he thought, and he thought. And at times, when you’re reading it, you get a little bit mixed up. Who is he? Is it the husband or the lifeguard? And who is she? Is it the speaker or is it the girlfriend? And partly I think that’s deliberate. In a way, the lifeguard and the girlfriend in their drama are able to carry some of the difficult dynamics that are happening between the speaker and the husband. Not everybody can talk about absolutely everything that seems to be lost between them. And sometimes we need sport or film or something that happens between friends or something that happens like here between strangers in order to be able to release some steam in the hope that it can be somewhat of a reset between people who really do love each other and work well together. But other times it can be an indication of something else. And I love that we don’t know that about this poem. How it will end? We have no idea.
[music: “Outstretched Hand” by Gautam Srikishan]
“How It Will End” by Denise Duhamel
“We’re walking on the boardwalk
but stop when we see a lifeguard and his girlfriend
fighting. We can’t hear what they’re saying,
but it is as good as a movie. We sit on a bench to find out
how it will end. I can tell by her body language
he’s done something really bad. She stands at the bottom
of the ramp that leads to his hut. He tries to walk halfway down
to meet her, but she keeps signaling don’t come closer.
My husband says, ‘Boy, he’s sure in for it,’
and I say, ‘He deserves whatever’s coming to him.’
My husband thinks the lifeguard’s cheated, but I think
she’s sick of him only working part time
or maybe he forgot to put the rent in the mail.
The lifeguard tries to reach out
and she holds her hand like Diana Ross
when she performed ‘Stop in the Name of Love.’
The red flag that slaps against his station means strong currents.
‘She has to just get it out of her system,’
my husband laughs, but I’m not laughing.
I start to coach the girl to leave her no-good lifeguard,
but my husband predicts she’ll never leave.
I’m angry at him for seeing glee in their situation
and say, ‘That’s your problem–you think every fight
is funny. You never take her seriously,’ and he says,
‘You never even give the guy a chance and you’re always nagging,
so how can he tell the real issues from the nitpicking?’
and I say, ‘She doesn’t nitpick!’ and he says, ‘Oh really?
Maybe he should start recording her tirades,’ and I say,
‘Maybe he should help out more,’ and he says,
‘Maybe she should be more supportive,’ and I say,
‘Do you mean supportive or do you mean support him?’
and my husband says that he’s doing the best he can,
that he’s a lifeguard for Christ’s sake, and I say
that her job is much harder, that she’s a waitress
who works nights carrying heavy trays and is hit on all the time
by creepy tourists and he just sits there most days napping
and listening to ‘Power 96’ and then ooh
he gets to be the big hero blowing his whistle
and running into the water to save beach bunnies who flatter him,
and my husband says, it’s not as though she’s Miss Innocence
and what about the way she flirts, giving free refills
when her boss isn’t looking or cutting extra large pieces of pie
to get bigger tips, oh no she wouldn’t do that because she’s a saint
and he’s the devil, and I say, ‘I don’t know why you can’t just admit
he’s a jerk,’ and my husband says, ‘I don’t know why you can’t admit
she’s a killjoy,’ and then out of the blue the couple is making up.
The red flag flutters, then hangs limp.
She has her arms around his neck and is crying into his shoulder.
He whisks her up into his hut. We look around, but no one is watching us.”
[music: “Praise the Rain” by Gautam Srikishan]
Chris Heagle: “How It Will End” comes from Denise Duhamel’s book Blowout. Thank you to University of Pittsburgh Press who gave us permission to use Denise’s poem. Read it on our website at onbeing.org.
[music: “Praise the Rain” by Gautam Srikishan]
Poetry Unbound is: Gautam Srikishan, Eddie Gonzalez, Lucas Johnson, Kayla Edwards, Tiffany Champion, Cameron Musar, and me, Chris Heagle.
Our music is composed and provided by Gautam Srikishan and Blue Dot Sessions.
This podcast is produced by On Being Studios, which is located on Dakota land. Open your world to poetry with us by subscribing to our Substack newsletter. For links and to find out more visit poetryunbound.org.
Books & Music
Recommended Reading
The On Being Project is an affiliate partner of Bookshop.org and Amazon.com. Any earnings we receive through these affiliate partnerships go into directly supporting The On Being Project.